<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FireEye and the value of information	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://axisofeasy.com/metaviews/fireeye-and-the-value-of-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://axisofeasy.com/metaviews/fireeye-and-the-value-of-information/?pk_campaign=feed&#038;pk_kwd=fireeye-and-the-value-of-information&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fireeye-and-the-value-of-information</link>
	<description>Rapid Coverage of a World Gone Full Cyberpunk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Barnett, Ph.D.		</title>
		<link>https://axisofeasy.com/metaviews/fireeye-and-the-value-of-information/?pk_campaign=feed&#038;pk_kwd=fireeye-and-the-value-of-information/#comment-60641</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Barnett, Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://axisofeasy.com/?p=23126#comment-60641</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is amazing how politicisation obscures rational reasoning.  And also how the paucity of scientific knowledge leads partisans to want to falsify data UNNECESSARILY.

Rebekah Jones produced a a map display of some data which appeared to contradict a correct political decision.  She should not have been asked to alter the data, still less be raided.

Here is the problem: PCR tests do not measure active virus.  In fact, at the absurdly high number of amplification cycles being used, a positive PCR could pick up viral RNA fragments from an encounter with SARS-CoV-2 that the testee had vanquished months ago.  So the positve test could actually be evidence of immunity.

In other words, the map that Ms Jones was asked to produce (and then fake) provided no useful information one-way or the other re the lockdown poilcy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amazing how politicisation obscures rational reasoning.  And also how the paucity of scientific knowledge leads partisans to want to falsify data UNNECESSARILY.</p>
<p>Rebekah Jones produced a a map display of some data which appeared to contradict a correct political decision.  She should not have been asked to alter the data, still less be raided.</p>
<p>Here is the problem: PCR tests do not measure active virus.  In fact, at the absurdly high number of amplification cycles being used, a positive PCR could pick up viral RNA fragments from an encounter with SARS-CoV-2 that the testee had vanquished months ago.  So the positve test could actually be evidence of immunity.</p>
<p>In other words, the map that Ms Jones was asked to produce (and then fake) provided no useful information one-way or the other re the lockdown poilcy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
